Science

Study: Birds at Fowlers Gap convey meaning with calls

A chestnut-crowned babbler at Fowlers Gap. Image Wimimedia Commons
Thursday, 2 July, 2015

Research on chestnut-crowned babblers at UNSW’s Fowlers Gap Arid Research Station near Broken Hill has revealed that these social birds can communicate in a way that was thought to be exclusive to humans.

Researchers at the Universities of Exeter and Zurich discovered that the outback bird has the ability to convey new meaning by rearranging the meaningless sounds in its calls.

This babbler bird communication is reminiscent of the way humans form meaningful words from meaningless sounds.

The research findings, which are published in the journal PLOS Biology, reveal a potential early step in the emergence of the elaborate language systems we use today.

“Although previous studies indicate that animals, particularly birds, are capable of stringing different sounds together as part of a complex song, these songs generally lack a specific meaning and changing the arrangement of sounds within a song does not seem to alter its overall message,” says lead author Sabrina Engesser from the University of Zurich.

“In contrast to most songbirds, chestnut-crowned babblers do not sing. Instead its extensive vocal repertoire is characterised by discrete calls made up of smaller acoustically distinct individual sounds."

Co-author Professor Andy Russell from the University of Exeter, who has been studying the babblers at Fowlers Gap since 2004, says: “We think that babbler birds may choose to rearrange sounds to code new meaning because doing so through combining two existing sounds is quicker than evolving a new sound altogether.”

The researchers noticed that chestnut-crowned babblers reused two sounds “A” and “B” in different arrangements when performing specific behaviours. When flying, the birds produced a flight call “AB”, but when feeding chicks in the nest they emitted “BAB” prompt calls.

When the researchers played the sounds back, the listening birds showed they were capable of discriminating between the different call types by looking at the nests when they heard a feeding prompt call and by looking out for incoming birds when they heard a flight call.

This was also the case when the researchers switched elements between the two calls: making flight calls from prompt elements and prompt calls from flight elements, indicating that the two calls were indeed generated from rearrangements of the same sounds.

“This is the first time that the capacity to generate new meaning from rearranging meaningless elements has been shown to exist outside of humans,” co-author Dr Simon Townsend from the University of Zurich says.

“Although the two babbler bird calls are structurally very similar, they are produced in totally different behavioural contexts and listening birds are capable of picking up on this.”

The authors report that in the chestnut-crowned babbler, the first sound element “B” is what seems to differentiate the meaning between flight and prompt vocalisations, akin to cat and at in English, where the c represents the meaning differentiating element, or phoneme.

“Although this so-called phoneme structuring is of a very simple kind, it might help us understand how the ability to generate new meaning initially evolved in humans,” says Dr Townsend.

“It could be that when phoneme structuring first got off the ground in our hominid ancestors, this is the form it initially took”.

Media contacts:

UNSW Science media: Deborah Smith: 9385 7307, 0478 492 060, Deborah.smith@unsw.edu.au

Professor Andrew Russell:a.russell@exeter.ac.uk